全球主机交流论坛

 找回密码
 注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

IP归属甄别会员请立即修改密码
查看: 2732|回复: 11
打印 上一主题 下一主题

谁给翻一下,貌似VPN要全面封锁啊

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
1#
发表于 2012-12-23 18:32:16 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式

ust came across this article, China wants to "block" VPN's
HONG KONG — China appears to have reinforced its Internet firewall in recent days, blocking some of the leading services that allow people on the mainland to access forbidden sites like 推特, FB and 有图比.

International business transactions also are being affected, Internet analysts said. The Chinese-language edition of The New York Times remains 100 percent blocked.

At least three foreign companies — Astrill, WiTopia and StrongVPN — have apologized to customers whose virtual private networks, or VPNs, have been slowed or disabled. VPNs are used to circumvent the Communist **’s firewall. The companies, meanwhile, were suggesting some work-arounds.

The daily newspaper Global Times, affiliated with the Communist Party, acknowledged the firewall had been “upgraded,” but it also warned that foreign providers of VPN services were operating illegally.

China blocks online searches of politically sensitive terms, smothers embarrassing news events, blocks online messages from dissidents and simply deletes any microblog posts that it dislikes.

The firewall also blocks countless Web sites that are openly available to users elsewhere around the world — from **ography sites and commercial come-ons to news reporting, political activism and religious proselytizing. Users on the mainland thus have to use VPNs to reach the banned sites.

Liu Xiao Ming, the Chinese ambassador to Britain, told the BBC on Friday that there was “a misconception about the Internet and development in China.”

“In fact, the Chinese are very much open in terms of the Internet,” he said, quoted in an article in The South China Morning Post. “In fact, we have the most number of Internet users in China today.”

An estimated 600 million Chinese have access to the Internet.

Foreign businesses also use VPNs not only to safeguard their transactions but also to keep ** **s and rival companies from seeing their corporate communications.

Global Times quoted an anonymous executive at a foreign technology company operating in China who said the lack of a VPN would damage the firm’s operations.

Josh Ong, China editor of the tech monitoring site The Next Web, said in an interview with the Voice of America that international companies were reporting disruptions in their corporate VPN services.

“A lot of companies have a general policy that they must use their own proxy network in order to transfer data, especially into and out of China,” Mr. Ong said. “So you are looking at banks or e-commerce companies, anyone who is transferring very sensitive information, a lot of them use corporate VPNs.”

Mr. Ong suggested that the tightening of the firewall could be tied to the recent leadership change in the Chinese Communist Party.

“It is certainly possible that some of it is just a general flexing of might, kind of coming in with a strong arm to really show who’s in control,” he said. “But there is definitely something intentional happening when these VPN services are being restricted.”

As Bill Bishop wrote recently on DealBook, China’s management of the Internet “has not been encouraging for those who want to believe the leadership will push reforms.”

“I have lived in Beijing since 2005, and these have been the most draconian few days of Internet restrictions I have experienced,” he said last month.

“Indiscriminate blocking of major parts of the global Internet is not going to help China in its quest to internationalize the renminbi and make it a reserve currency,” Bill said. “Internet controls at the level of the last few days may also deter foreign firms from moving their regional headquarters to China.”


谁给翻译下
2#
发表于 2012-12-23 18:37:12 | 只看该作者
坐等大牛的对策。东厂西厂有高手,民间也有高人!
3#
发表于 2012-12-23 18:38:18 | 只看该作者
4#
发表于 2012-12-23 18:43:47 | 只看该作者
不懂英文就不要去LEB了
5#
发表于 2012-12-23 18:49:59 | 只看该作者
只是一篇普通的国外关于中国G/F/W以及互联网政策的评价。

要点是:
1. 香港媒体指出G/F/W做了升级和增强;
2. 国外的某几家V/P/N服务公司需要为网络延迟或中断向客户道歉。
3. PARTY下属的《环球时报》证实G/F/W已经做了增强,更警告国外服务商提供V/P/N服务(这里应该是指向天朝人民提供)是非法的。
4. 然后就是对国内外不同行业生活在不同地方的人们的采访,以控诉中国的网络封锁行为。以及相关评论。



郑重声明:以上观点,都来自楼主提供的英文内容的不成熟理解,不代表本人观点。我坚信:天朝的网络是世界上最开放、最自由、最**的网络,这些言论都是国外**势力的污蔑。我们拥有世界上最多的网民,每天在中国的网络上产生的言论是天文数字,而被XX掉的只是九牛一毛,跟跑路的IDC一样,不能代表主流。

6#
发表于 2012-12-23 18:53:29 | 只看该作者
楼上碉堡了啊
7#
发表于 2012-12-23 19:10:19 | 只看该作者
真搞不懂,翻一下又不会死,居然封锁
8#
发表于 2012-12-23 19:11:31 来自手机 | 只看该作者
dvbhack 发表于 2012-12-23 18:49
只是一篇普通的国外关于中国G/F/W以及互联网政策的评价。

要点是:

结尾红字亮了
9#
发表于 2012-12-23 19:19:21 | 只看该作者
哈哈
10#
发表于 2012-12-23 19:23:09 | 只看该作者
不明觉厉
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|全球主机交流论坛

GMT+8, 2025-11-1 09:00 , Processed in 0.117786 second(s), 13 queries , Gzip On, MemCache On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

© 2001-2023 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表